The Value of Forecasting with the Wave Principle
With the caveat of immense specific variability within the known aspects of the Wave Principle, it is still the
case that the practical value of all we know about it is immense. The first fantastic value that the Wave Principle provides is an amazing perspective.
The second value is an occasionally remarkable accuracy, as you can see in Chapter 6.
The third great value is that it provides a basis for assessing the past and analyzing the present in
a consistent context, to which all the predictive literature on the subject attests. Finally, the Wave Principle indicates in advance the relative magnitude of the next period
of social progress or regress.
With all these gifts, we have a basis for informed, truly rational decision-making with regard to anticipating the tenor of future events. Its very nature forces us
to look at the big picture, elevating our perceptions above the cacophony of daily news
and providing the opportunity to make sense of great social trend changes and the dramatic events
that accompany them. As a result, the Wave Principle provides
a basis for achieving a great sense of calm about the future, which no longer appears as a black cloud of unknowable chaos (sometimes just a grey cloud of partly knowable chaos). The general results of social mood, i.e.,
economic trends, political trends, peace and war, etc., are fairly easy to predict, as they follow what has already occurred in social mood. Predicting social mood trends themselves, and their immediate reflectors such as stock index trends, fashion and entertainment trends, etc, is more difficult, but the Wave Principle at least provides a basis for doing so. With knowledge of how the pattern unfold, to the extent of our ability, effort and emotional detachment, we can enjoy success even at that daunting task. Because the Wave Principle describes
patterns of collective behavior,
the accuracy of any resulting forecast depends upon (1) the reliability of the investing’s crowd behavioral patterns and (2) the ability of an analyst to identify the relevant ones properly.
In fact, the patterns, while varied, are more than reliable, within the bounds of their definitions, they are inviolate,
a characteristic that makes wave analysis incalculable superior to other methods.An analyst’s ability to identify the relevant patterns, interpret them properly and anticipate the ones to follow is another matter. That task is exceedingly difficult. Nevertheless, even on that score, the
Wave Principle provides some advantages that most forecasting methods lack. For instance, it provides a method of conceiving and then ranking alternative scenarios. Perhaps most important, the Wave Principle provides a built-in mechanism for changing one’s mind. The ultimate determinant of the objective analyst’s opinion is the market itself, not a presumption about outside causes.
This approach provides an objective basis for staying in tune with the developing trends and for changing one’s opinion when necessary. Social forecasting is an ability that has deftly eluded man throughout his existence and indeed has been considered as impossible as a perpetual-motion machine. The Wave Principle changes all that. Because of it, we finally have a way to forecast much about our social future, not with magic or revelation or astrology or sorcery or voodoo or mindless linear extrapolation, but with science. Convey and Highfield assert, quite generously given the state of conventional economics, that
“economics straddles the divide between science and the humanities.” With the Wave Principle, economics is now science, and with
socionomics, even the humanities are tools of science. (The Wave Principle Of Human Social Behavior And
The New Science of Socionomics, Robert R. Prechter, 1999 )
Read more
Moment of Truth
NASDAQ Composite
Index
© ELLIOTT today,
June 14,2007

2647?
Weekly
update
© ELLIOTT today, July 15, 2006
Below there is the chart of the Nasdaq Composite Index of May 12, 2006 just in the time window
when both
the Dow and the S&P 500 were topping. One important test of a scientific hypothesis is its
ability to predict outcomes. Although the Wave Principle hypothesis is difficult to quantify on the
basis of predictability because
it forecasts only probabilistically, there is nevertheless substantial evidence
of its unique value. while reviewing the following excerpts, it is important that you honestly consider
the utter uncertainty that exists in real-time forecasting. Psychological experiments show that most
people who review events in retrospect consider them
to have been obviously implied at the time.
As Lee Simonson once said, "Any event, once it has occurred,
can be made to appear inevitable by
a competent historian."
Forecast of May 12,
2006
NASDAQ Composite
Index
Figure 1
...and here is the
outcome so far
Nasdaq
Composite Index
© ELLIOTT today, July 15, 2006
Figure 2
Below the chart I plotted the 14-day
RSI. Since the RSI reached its high late November the
relative strength
of the upward move in the market steadily lost momentum implying that
indeed a fifth wave was in force.
(fifth waves are weaker than third
waves..) I do not counting the structure from August 2004
to October 2005
as a triangle because the pattern following wave 4
wasn't "swift and short" as the description of the Wave Principle
used to say. The structure is best counted as a "three" with a expanding
triangle in wave b
and an expanding diagonal triangle in wave c. The overall picture
supports
the case I pointed out in several reports before: the pattern in the
Nasdaq
Composite Index is an ending pattern, a diagonal triangle, the most
bearish
pattern the EWP has to offer. Minor wave 1 down stopped right at the
level
of the previous fourth wave and a simple a-b-c countertrend move
completed
wave 2. This week the Nasdaq Composite was off 4.35% the worst performance of the three major indexes.
Thanks to the wave form this behavior was anticipated well before the fact.
Short term, the sentiment is outright bearish, showing only 10% bulls, which is the lowest reading
since
the August 2004 bottom. The Nasdaq Composite may fall a bit further early next week but
a bounce is due. Longer term, the Nasdaq Composite will retrace the DT
which
means a move to or below the 1800s is
warranted. Short term support
provides the rising 3x1 FiboFan line.
...another
"great Chart"
Price
& Time in the DJIA
In the 1990s, Donald Vodopich teached me how to use the FiboFan lines and for him those lines
where the real support and resistance levels. The most important line however was what he called
the "0-line." (Zero-line). The "Zero-line" is an almost horizontal line where prices often fluctuate
to and fro and finally break through. Classic technical analysis calls it support and resistance. But
it is more: Once the line is broken more often than not a short term pullback occurs but finally prices
will move powerful in direction of the preceeding move, which in this case is down. The 0-line often
indicates a sudden swift in sentiment from complacency to fear and panic. Since my prefered count
calls for a third wave down the point of recognation is not far away. With regard to the ML-2 the market broke the lower channel line already in May but pulled back in June. The latest break of that line caught
many analysts and the media with "surprise". Friday the Dow made it to the previous low and is now back
where it was in December 2005 and January 2006. Near term the Dow is testing not only the previous
low but the important ML-1. Short term, the market may hold the near term support for some time but
also a gap-down on Monday will indicate a more severe decline into late July.
On July 17, 1990 the DJIA made an important top. For the first time the DJIA reached 3000 with an
hourly reading of 3025. On July 15, 2006 the DJIA reached 11,670 a hairsbreath from the closing
price of 11,723 on January 14, 2000. Now consider this, from July 17, 1990 to July 2006 the distance
is 16 years or 5760 days
(1 year = 360 days, 1 month = 30 days).
5760 x 1.618 = 9,319.68.
11,670 - 9,319.68 = 2,350.32.
The low of October 11,1990 was 2,345 (+/-5).
Weekly Update, May 13, 2006
Special Report: Gigantic Double Top In The Dow !
© ELLIOTT today
A clear cut five-wave structure from the low of October 2005 was completed on May 10, 2006.The
ending pattern, a expanding diagonal triangle spells trouble ahead for the bulls. At minimum, the
whole pattern will be retraced which in this case means a drop to the 10,800 area, a drop of 870
points or 7.45 percent and probably more. A drop to the low of August 2004 in the S&P or October
2004 in the Dow would call for a drop of about 14% and as the long term chart of the Dow reveals,
that level of 10,000 lies at the long term lower trend channel line.
Elliott Wave
Analysis, Outcome & Forecast
© ELLIOTT today

I don't know if the journalist has any knowledge of the Elliott Wave Principle or maybe even some thoughts about the complex, but the words "gone up too far too fast" pointing exactly to the description Ralph Nelson Elliott used to explain one of the most bearish patterns the Elliott Wave Principle has to
offer: Diagonal Triangles. (EWP, page 31). "A diagonal triangle is a special type of wave which occurs primarily
in the fifth wave position at times when the preceding move has gone "too far too fast."
Here we are. The pattern in the DJIA is an expanding diagonal triangle. It is the same 3-3-3-3-3 pattern of overlapping waves that defines a wedge, but the lines do not converge, they diverge. In other words, it is a
newly observed pattern variation.
According to EWI, "The major stock averages declined between 9% and 12% from their May highs, erasing (or worse) any gains
for the year thus far. But in the face of this sell-off, sentiment seemed downright complacent -- how else to explain one of the headlines I included yesterday
which actually claimed, "Tumbling Markets May
Be Reflection Of Strong Growth"?"
"Mind you, that appeared on page one of the nation's largest financial paper -- which barely a month ago
(May 11) had run a page one story under the headline, "Behind Surging Stock Market: Old-Fashioned Economic Boom." Up, down, what's the difference? It all means the same thing, don'tcha
know…"
Says CNBC Market Dispatches on 6/15/2006:
"Dow up 198 as Bernanke soothes Bernanke touts economy's capacity to deal with higher energy prices. Dow up more than 198 points. Hewlett-Packard, Boeing, Caterpillar lead the Dow. Bear Stearns tops profit expectations."
...and on June 16, 2006:
"With stocks fresh off an impressive two-day rally, another round of hawkish Fed speak sparked some concern that stocks may have gone up too far too fast, prompting investors to lock in some profits. Stocks soared this afternoon after Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke offered soothing remarks about the economy's ability to weather rising energy costs and interest rates."
(Classic Example of "The Potent Director's Presumption")
Elliott Wave Analysis:
Figure 1 displays the DJIA from the low of October 2005 instead of bars with closing prices only. As can be seen, the first leg up from the low of October 2006 traced out what looks like a three-wave structure. Several times in the past I pointed out that this behavior is not the start of a new bull leg - it is rather part of a more complex pattern as the five-wave
up move from the low of October 2005 is part - wave c - of an a-b-c structure which ended wave 3 on May 5, 2006. The recent a-b-c formation may not be the whole pattern the market needs to complete wave 4. An a-b-c x a-b-c double three may be unfolding with one more lower prices ahead and surprising the
"bulls". Nevertheless, a powerful rally is expected thereafter most likely into the early September time zone.
Weekly Update
December
16, 2006, © ELLIOTT today
"The prefered
count for the Dow indicates that a high of major importance has been
achieved on May 10, 2006 but I won't let the "impossible"
ruled out, so we are prepared for what could happen.
"The majority
believes a downward wave into October of 2006, but what will they say if the market holds up and rallies
till
the end of the year?"
A famous example back
in 1990 was the Nikkey, when it topped on the first day of that
year."
Weekly update, July 22, 2006, © ELLIOTT today
Elliott
Wave Analysis:
The pattern in the Dow is
best counted as either an (a)-(b)-(c) (x) (a)-(b)-(c) double zigzag
with wave (c) of the second (a)-(b)-(c) an expanding diagonal
triangle. This is the most bearish pattern the EWP has to offer.
Reversals following the completion of such a formation are dramatic
and will shock the majority. The Dow is approaching the limit of the
terminal pattern, in fact, the "last gasp" rally produced a
slight "overthrow" of the upper trendline. The fifth swing
has moved right into Fibonacci wave length relationship since the
fifth wave now has traveled 16.87%, the same length as waves 1 through
3. 10,000 - 11,670 = +1670 or 16.7%.
Because markets are patterned, the concept of near-perfect collective forecasting must be false.
Otherwise, future events would have to be patterned according to the Wave Principle, and the
collective would have to anticipate each nuance perfectly. This is an untenable position.
(The Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior, 1999 by Robert R. Prechter)
4
Months after ELLIOTT today forecasted another powerful wave up
the media suddenly realized the fact:
Börsenrekord:
Historischer Tag an der Wall Street
Der wichtigste US-Börsenindex knackte die Marke zum erstenmal in seiner
Geschichte. Für die letzten tausend Punkte hat der Dow Jones mehr als sieben
Jahre gebraucht. Doch der Allzeit-Rekord könnte
schon bald Geschichte sein.
Die Autoren lieferen auch gleich die Begründung
"für den neu entfachten
Optimismus der Anleger"
mit: Der auf unter 59 US-Dollar gesunkene Ölpreis
und ein Bericht des Handelsministeriums, "der auf nachlassenden
Inflationsdruck hindeutet."
Weiter heisst es: "An den Aktienbörsen
wird
derzeit ein Idealszenario aus niedriger Inflation und robuster Konjunktur- und
Gewinnentwicklung gespielt." Gespielt? "Börsianer nennen dies ein
Goldlöckchen-Szenario." Die Welt online, 19.10.2006
The socionomic hypothesis explains the data. Changes in the stock market immediately reflect the changes in endogenous social mood. As
social mood becomes increasingly positive, productive activity
increases; as social mood becomes increasingly negative, productive activity decreases.
These results show up in lagging economic statistics as expansions and recessions. The standard presumption has no explanation for the relative timing of these two
phenomena.
(The Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior, 1999 by Robert R. Prechter)
Read
more
Forecasting Price Extremes on
the Basis of
Typical Wave Relationships
SPX, May 13, 2006
(c) ELLIOTT today

On April 1, 2006, ELLtoday said,
"One more push up is likely in the SPX, probably into the $1320
area +/- as outlined before." Internal wave structure can be counted as complete together with
a classic parallel trend channel. Up site momentum is waning dramatically (Rate of Change) and
a break of the small rising trend line points to more intensive decline most probably to about 1250, which marks the previous fourth wave. This, on the other hand, may be only a temporary halt. Based on typical wave length relationships the entire move from 1168 to 1326 (+158)
provides equality with the move from 1060 to 1217 (+157).
Forecasting Pattern on the Basis of Pattern
As L.F.Richardson pointed out, the length of a seacoast is dependent upon your
method of measuring and your scale. A ruler placed on a globe will give one answer;
the same ruler applied to every indentation as one traverses the coast itself will give
a vastly different one. Similarly, when people ask me where the stock market is going
or even what its trend has been, I have to ask, "What degree of trend are you talking
about?"
There can be mulitply answers, as in, "The Minor trend is down within a sideways
Intermediate trend within
a rising Primary trend."
One important test of scientific hypothesis is its ability to predict outcomes. Although
the Wave Principle hypothesis is difficult to quantify on the basis of predictability because
it forecasts only probabilistically, there
is nevertheless substantial evidence of its unique value. While reviewing the following example excerpts, it is important that you honestly
consider the utter uncertainty that exists in real-time forecasting. Psychological experiments
show that most people who review events in retrospect consider them to have been
obviously implied at the time. I think that after you read these statements and consider
them in the proper light, you will agree that the author's accuracy in describing the
future is due to his knowing something useful.
ELLIOTT today's
Forecast of November 20, 2006
The Fibonacci ratio recurs in certain price relationships among waves. This fact provides
a basis for creating guidelines applicable to very specific price forecasting. On November
20, 2006, I presented a study entitled "Fibonacci in the S&P 500 Index" and I said,
"at 1406 a remarkable web of Fibonacci wave lengths relationship would be achieved
and due to the completion of the second (a)-(b)-(c) of a double zigzag correction since
the low of July 2002, from an Elliott point of view, the probability is high that an important
top is at hand."
On November 21,2006 I prepared a bar chart (10min.) labeled according to the rules
and guidelines of the Wave Principle and put in a red-line pointing to the near-future
course of the market. In reaching the Fibonacci target, the SPX traced out an impeccable
pattern. The chart illustrates how the Wave Principle operates even on a smaller time
frame. Notice that all waves within the boundary lines are constructred of three-waves,
as required for a diagonal triangle. Diagonal triangles take a wedge shape within two
converging lines, with each subwave, including the impulse waves, subdividing into a
"three," as illustrated in The Wave Principle. A rising wedge is usually followed by a
sharp decline retracing at least back to where the diagonal triangle began. (EWP, p.31).