Home ] Nach oben ] SPTD-08 ] Elliott Wave Articles ] Wave Principle ] Socionomics08 ] Info ]

 

Category: Fashion

 

NEW YORKER FASHION WEEK
Die neue Nüchternheit
Die US-Fashion Week startete dieses Jahren unter schwierigen Vorzeichen, schreibt der Spiegel online, "im Land ist die Stimmung wegen des Irakkrieges getrübt, in der Modewelt tobt die Diskussion um Magermodels." Das Modespektakel wird Experten zufolge, "weniger schrill als in so manchem anderen Jahr". "Auch die Rocklänge soll wieder unter das Knie rutschen." Quelle: Spiegel online, 4.2.2007


Trend in Hemlines

Harvard graduate Ralph Rotnem, a researcher at the Harris Upham brokerage firm, originated the so-called "hemline-theory," which is the recognition that women's skirt lengths tend to rise and fall in tandem with the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Though this idea is often dismissed as frivolous, socionomics explains why there is a correlation. The trends of stock prices and women's hemlines are a function of social mood. When people feel bold and frisky, they buy stocks and wear more revealing clothes. When they feel
threatened and conservative, they sell stocks and wear more concealing clothes. It is that simple. Because skirt lengths have limits (the floor and the upper thigh respectively), the reaching of a limit implies the concurrence of an extreme positive or negative mood. As Figure 15-1 illustrates, hemlines went very low at the stock market bottom of 1921. 

They rose to miniskirts brevity in the late 1920s and late 1960s peaking with stock prices both times. Hemlines plunged to maxiskirt floor-lengths in the 1930s and1970s, bottoming with stock prices both times. Today, as we head into 1999,skirts worn by models and celebrities are extremely short (one runway featured what looks like a wide belt), while those worn by the general public are just shy of 1968's minidress length.(The Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior, 1999, Robert R. Prechter jr.) 

 

A new kind of Couric effect   
For her new role as CBS anchorwoman, Katie Couric has dropped the brightly colored suits, took the flip 
out from her bob and, through the magic of Photoshop, lost 20 pounds.  USA Today, 08/31/2006  

 





"Miami Vice" - Pastell ist passe 

Meisterlich demontiert Michael Mann mit einer späten Kino-Adaption den Mythos 
seiner erfolgreichen TV-Serie "Miami Vice": 20 Jahre nach Pastellsakko-Revolution 
und MTV-Ästhetik lässt der Regisseur seine berühmten Undercover-Cops an einer 
düsteren Realität verzweifeln. "Sehnsucht nach dem Flamingo" - so könnte man 
die gedämpfte Reaktion vieler Kritiker angesichts der Kinoversion von "Miami Vice" 
beschreiben. Der rosafarbene Vogel, der von einer schillernden Wasseroberfläche 
abhebt, war das erste Bild im Vorspann der berühmten TV-Serie, eine Metapher für 
den Kult, den die perfekt durchgestylte Drogenfahnder-Saga auslöste.

"Der pink flamingo hat sich in einen schwarzen Raben verwandelt."
(Spiegel online, 24. August 2006) 

Die Serie galt als trend- und stilweisend sowohl in der Ausstattung als auch in der filmischen Umsetzung der Drehbücher. HarteSchnitte und schnelle Bildfolgen, Sequenzenin Zeitlupe 
und überlange Einstellungen von Gesichtern; pastellfarbene und Kulissen oder auch mit 
kaltem Neonlicht grell ausgeleuchtete Szenen erinnerten vielfach an die Videoclips der Musiksender.Die Protagonisten stellten Yuppies dar und entsprachen dem Zeitgeist der 1980er Jahre. "Miami Vice" hatte einen großen Einfluss auf die Entwicklung der Männer- mode in der zweiten Hälfte der 1980er Jahre und prägte den "weißes T-Shirt unter Armani-Jacke"-Stil, welcher insbesondere bei Don Johnson zu sehen war. Man stattete die beiden Hauptfiguren mit pastellfarbenen Sakkos, Lederslippern ohne Socken, den Wayfarer- Sonnenbrillen von Ray Ban und italienischen Sportwagen aus. Zahllose Musiktitel namhafter Rock- und Pop-Größen (der damaligen Zeit) fanden sich in der Serie wieder. Stellvertretend für viele andere seien hier genannt: Phil Collins, Billy Idol, Frankie Goes To Hollywood, The Hooters, Tina Turner, Yello, Peter Gabriel, The Who, Bryan Ferry, Depeche Mode, Bryan Adams, Foreigner, Glenn Frey von den Eagles und Jackson Browne. Die Titelmusik "Theme from Miami Vice" von Jan Hammer schaffte es auf Platz 1 der US-Singlecharts; im Jahr 1987 war der ebenfalls aus der Serie und von Hammer stammende Titel "Crockett's Theme" in einigen Ländern Europas in den Top 5."

Der neue US-Thriller "Miami Vice", ein düsteres Remake der TV-Kultserie , schreibt der Spiegel online. Die Kino-Version der TV-Serie "Miami Vice" ist düster, fatalistisch und brillant: James "Sonny" Crockett (Colin Farrell, l) und Ricardo "Rico" Tubbs (Jamie Foxx) tragen metall- und erdfarbene Anzüge" urteilt die Welt. 'Miami Vice': The (re)-view from a fan CNN, Saturday, July 29, 2006: Colin Farrell and Jamie Foxx's style doesn't overwhelm the film version of "Miami Vice. "Leave the pastel T-shirt and linen suit in the closet and put on some socks."


 

"It's In To Be Out These Days."

Alternate sexual lifestyles is another bear market theme that has advanced to the forefront of popular culture in recent weeks. This connection was first suggested by the 1985 Special Report, "Popular Culture and the Stock Market," EWT's initial study on the relationship between mood and its manifestations. One of the relationships EWT noticed right off the bat was that in bull markets , gender idolas are sexually distinct and stereotypical (John Wayne and Marilyn Monroe in the 1950s; Arnold Schwarzenegger and Madonna in the 1980s), while their bear-market counterparts are mixed and blurred. 

"The Days of Sex Stereotyping are Quickly Crumbling," a headline reports. The gender-bending even extends to the "macho sport" of professional soccers where David Beckham, the world's most popular player conducts himself with a "stylish androgyny" that has pushed the sport past "lines of sports and sexuality that are rarely crossed by elite athletes." 
A new unrivaled popularity for gay themes was signaled by an early June USA Today headline that declared, "It's In To Be Out These Days." EWFF, August 2003
More about Socionomics

 

 

 

Madonna in Düsseldorf
Sex und Religion und großer Kitsch

Madonnas erstes Deutschland-Konzert im Rahmen ihrer aktuellen Tour,  natürlich mit Kreuzigungsszene: Mit dieser Inszenierung hatte die 47-Jährige für einen Sturm der Entrüstung gesorgt. Die Staatsanwaltschaft Düsseldorf hatte angekündigt, den Auftritt genau beobachten zu wollen. Die Welt online, 22. August 2006. Read more

 

 

A new kind of Couric effect   
For her new role as CBS anchorwoman, Katie Couric has dropped the brightly colored suits, took the flip out from her bob and, through the magic of Photoshop, lost 20 pounds.  USA Today, 08/31/2006  

 

Socionomics Insight>>>

DAX >>>


 

 

Category: Gambling

 

Socionomics explains:

Actions typically not regarded as gambling

Emotional or physical risk-taking where what is being risked is not money or material goods (e.g., skydiving, running for office, asking someone for a date, etc.) Buying insurance, as the primary intent of the purchase is to protect against loss, rather than to collect. All forms of 'investment' (stock market, real estate) with positive expected returns, economic utility, and some underlying value independent of the risk being undertaken. Starting a new business, as time and effort are also being wagered and the outcome is not determined in a short period of time. Situations where the possibility of winning additional money or material goods is a secondary or incidental reason for the wager/purchase (e.g., buying a raffle ticket to support a worthy cause). Prediction markets or knowledge exchanges where the outcome is to encourage the development of market-based mechanisms for resolving questions of science, technology, management, strategy, planning, policy, etc. 

 


Congress Forces Gambling Off Line. Why?
By Mark Thornton
Posted on 10/26/2006

Congress purported to act to protect the values of the American people when it passed the "Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act." The result has been a serious blow to a growing industry. Whose values was Congress protecting? It had nothing to do with the American people at large. Congress was protecting the "values" of casino owners and those who work in the state lottery racket.

This "enforcement act" bans credit card transactions involving internet gambling websites. The bill was added to port security legislation at the last minute giving no one the chance to read it and little political opportunity for Congress to amend it or vote against it. It was the capstone to another very bad session of Congress.

The first fallout from this legislative bombshell was its impact on the major internet gambling companies who lost half their stock market value. Americans are reported to make up about half the global demand for internet gambling. These are the companies that were best serving their customers, providing them with relatively safe and low-cost opportunities to gamble.

Due to the nature of internet commerce, online gambling sites had already taken several measures to demonstrate that they provided a fair and reliable service. Competition between gambling websites had also produced enhanced consumer satisfaction as new safety features were added and copied across the marketplace for internet gambling.

For example, with online gambling you can go to a practice casino website where you can learn the rules, how to play the games, and the relevant strategies without risking real money. Once you are experienced and comfortable with the process you can then proceed to the real casino where real money is wagered. Do physical casinos offer such opportunities?

These online companies are competition for casinos and state lotteries and because of their lower cost, online casinos can offer their customers a much better payout rate - the percentage of bets that are paid out in winnings. Online casinos have a much higher payout rate with the best online casinos offering a rate exceeding 97 percent. State lotteries that target low income groups have a payout rate less than 50 percent.

We are told that families will no longer have to face all the dire consequences and socially destructive forces of gambling via the internet, but internet gambling companies actually solve many of the so-called negative externalities associated with brick-and-mortar casino gambling. Internet gambling does not undermine community values, expose women and children to socially undesirable activities, or introduce prostitution into communities. All of the so-called "unsightly" problems with Las Vegas-style casino gambling are not present with internet gambling.

Yes, people still lose money gambling, but that is not unlike "losing" money when I go to the grocery store, the baseball game, or Amazon.com. Many people find gambling fun and rewarding even though they know the odds are against them. The proliferation of online gambling has turned casino gaming into a normal good without the special allure that government bans once provided Las Vegas.

Online gambling also provides good jobs for people who want them. I am not a real gambler, but I recognize that gambling has created economic development in places where it otherwise had not occurred (think Las Vegas, Indian Reservations, Atlantic City, Mississippi). Online gambling is likewise creating jobs in development in places like poor island nations in the Caribbean

Will the ban work? The legislation is similar to the alcohol prohibition of the 1920s. It does not prevent Americans from gambling online so we are still free to search for potential websites. It only prevents the companies from making credit card transactions with US citizens so that the most "legitimate" online companies who "play by the rules" will exit the market. Other companies will operate in the underground economy. New companies will enter the market using techniques to get around the legislation.

People are generally safe using their credit cards online, but the new financial transactions will inevitably be less secure, more cumbersome, and subject to more fraud and abuse. The big, safe and secure sites have too much to lose from bad business practices and government attacks and these companies are precisely the ones that are most likely to go out of business in the United States. Their replacements in the underground e-economy are likely to be smaller companies that pose more risks to consumers.

This legislation will not stop internet gambling and will only make American online gamblers less safe. It is nothing more than a cheap election year ploy - covertly enacted - that purports to protect Americans and maintain moral values. The hypocrisy of the legislation goes beyond the exemption for brick and mortar casinos because it also allows internet gambling for horseracing and state lotteries. Don't be surprised if Congress even reverses itself after the election when the overseas internet gambling companies have the opportunity to lobby (i.e., buy off) the Congress.

It never works 

More than anything else, this legislation is the very pinnacle of puritanical nannyism. Here the government is declaring what you do in your home with your own money to be illegal. Even if it did work perfectly, it violates a critical stricture of the free society. As Mises noted, if we allow government to regulate such behavior there is nothing to prevent complete tyranny. Congressman Paul observed they have no business telling us what is useful behavior and what is not:

The big government nanny-state is based on the assumption that free markets can't provide the maximum good for the largest number of people. It assumes people are not smart or responsible enough to take care of themselves, and thus their needs must be filled through the government's forcible redistribution of wealth. Our system of intervention assumes that politicians and bureaucrats have superior knowledge, and are endowed with certain talents that produce efficiency.

The trouble with online gambling was that it was too successful in the eyes of many. To what extent were brick-and-mortar companies involved in lobbying for this? Forbes puts it this way:

U.S. gambling resorts and casinos like MGM Mirage and Harrah's Entertainment - which is reportedly being eyed by a private-equity consortium - may be the few to profit from the new law, along with the horse-racing industry, lotteries and fantasy sports operators, who have all been carved out of the new law.

If we want to know who was really behind the move, we need only ask: Cui Bono?

Der 100-Milliarden-Markt
(Der Spiegel 32/2006, 7.8.2006)

Die deutsche Finanzindustrie hat ein neues Erfolgsprodukt: Zertifikate. Mit Hilfe dieser Wertpapiere können Anleger von nahezu allen Markttrends profitieren, sie eignen sich für Zocker wie für sicherheitsbewusste Familienväter. Besonders lukrativ aber sind sie für die Banken.

"Haben Sie Angst, dass die Benzinpreise weiter steigen?" Dass sich die Inflation ausbreitet? Dass die schönen Zeiten steigender Aktienkurse wieder einmal vorbei sind?"

Keine Sorge, Ihnen kann geholfen werden. Mit der "Super Bleifrei Protect Anleihe" der US-Bank J.P.Morgan zum Beispiel, mit dem "Pro-Inflations-Zertifikat" der Hypo- Vereinsbank oder mit diversen Reverse-Bonus-Zertifikaten der Deutschen Bank. Die versprechen hohe Gewinne, wenn Ihre Berechnungen eintreffen. 

"Mit einer Zuwachsrate von 20% im ersten Halbjahr wird die Zertifikate-Industrie immer mehr zu einer ernstzunehmenden Konkurrenz für die Fondsbranche. Denn Zertifikate sind wesentlich flexibler, der Markt ist weitgehend unreguliert. Bis ein neuer Fond nach einem monatelangen Genehmigungsverfahren auf den Markt kommt, haben die etwa 30 Emittenten von Zertifikaten schon längst mit Hunderten Produkten darauf reagiert, daß Rohstoffe zurzeit eine glänzende Zukunft verhießen wird oder dass die Aktienkurse orientierungslos hin- und herschwanken. Zertifikaten werden innerhalb von 24 Stunden anhand mathematischer Risikomodelle entwickelt, meistens in den Handelsräumen der Londoner Investmentbanken. 

"Beim Marktführer Deutsche Bank waren es denn auch die Investmentbanker, die als Erste die Gewinnchancen bei der Emission von Zertifikaten entdeckten." Der Erfolg der Kollegen führte zu lauten Wehklagen bei den Traditionsbankern in Frankfurt. Der große Teil des Marktes für Zertifikate "besteht aus irgendwelchen Strukturen, die kein Mensch versteht. Das kann der Anleger nicht durchschauen, da gibt es überhaupt keine Transparenz" klagt der DWS-chef Axel Benkner noch im Mai 2004 in einem Interview - die DWS ist die Fondsgesellschaft der Deutschen Bank. 

Schreibt der Spiegel, "besonders beliebte Kunden sind bei den Banken die reinen Zocker. Für diese Anleger haben sie eine eigene Produktpalette, sogenannte "knock-out-Zertifikate, geschaffen." Hohen Gewinnchancen steht das Risiko des Totalverlustes gegenüber. Wenn der Kurs des zugrunde liegenden Wertpapiers einen bestimmten Wert unter- oder überschreitet, kann das ganze Zertifikat Wertlos werden. Es ist wie im Casino. (It's  Las Vegas, Baby)

 

 

Gambling

"It's Las Vegas, Baby!"

Glücksspiel:

"Umschmeichelte Zockerweibchen"
Der Spiegel Nr.34, 21.8.2006 

"Es ist ein ruhiger Sonntagvormittag. Entspannt geht Doreen Dahlke aus Wismar, im Hauptberuf Zugbegleiterin, ihrer Nebentätigkeit nach. Sie schleicht um die Ecke, hebt die Maschinenpistole und streckt mit ein paar Schüssen einen Angreifer nieder," so der Spiegel. "Rund dreimal pro Woche trainiert die junge Frau gemeinsam mit den sechs anderen Frauen aus dem ‚Spieleclan' namens "maedechenblu.t" das Ballerspiel "Counter-Strike". Scherzhaft bezeichenn sie sich selbst als "Zockerweibchen" Besonders der weibliche Zockermarkt bietet ein riesiges Wachstumspotential, da sind sich fast alle Experten einig. "Die Games Convention gibt sich daher betont weiblich." (Der Spiegel)

 

 

Kartellamt schränkt Lotto-Monopol der Länder ein. 

Die Bundesländer haben bei ihrem Kampf um das Glücksspiel-Monopol eine schwere Niederlage erlitten. Das Kartellamt untersagte staatlichen Lottogesellschaften, den Markt weiterhin unter sich aufzuteilen. Möglicherweise gibt es auch Auswirkungen auf das Geschäft mit den Sportwetten."Zocker unter sich", titelt Der Spiegel Nr. 33/2006 vom 14.8.2006 einen Artikel der Rubrik "Glückspiel" "Mit dem Verbot des größten privaten Sportwettenanbierters Bwin wollen die Bundesländer ihr Lotteriemonopol retten - Sportvereine und Fernsehsender zählen zu den großen Verlierern." Im Text heisst es u.a., "die Brüsseler Kommission drängt seit langem auf die Liberalisierung des Sportwettenmarktes. Doch vergangene Woche , pünktlich zum Bundesliga-Start, untersagte Sachsen Bwin, dem einzigen ernstzunehmenden Konkurrenten der staatllichen Lottotochter Oddset, das Geschäft - ein Verwaltungsakt, der nun eine ganze Branche erschüttert. Betroffen sind Sportvereine, Fußballclubs und Fernsehsender wie der Sportkanal DSF, die jetzt um millionenschwere Sponsoring- und Werbeverträge fürchten müssen." 

 

 

Seebad Blackpool: Zocken um die Zukunft

Einst war Blackpool die mondäne Diva unter Englands Seebädern. Heute verströmen leere Hotels ein einsamer Vergnügungspark und die verlassene Promenade den Charme einer maritimen Geisterstadt - nun soll ein Super-Kasino nach Las-Vegas-Art den Aufschwung bringen. Spiegel online, 6.September 2006
Bereits am 7.8.2006 berichtete der Spiegel (Der Spiegel Nr.32) in einer Reportage "Computerspiele", daß drei Deutschtürken aus Frankfurt das Computerspiel "Crysis" entwickelt haben und Bill Gates lobt ihre Fähigkeiten. Doch in Deutschland bekommen sie Probleme: "Crysis" ist ein Killer-Game und solche Spiele will die Regierung verbieten. 

 

 

"Jungs mit fliegenden Fingern" 

Der Spiegel Nr. 6/2006

"Computerspiele haben sich in Südkorea zur Wettkampfdisziplin und zum Publikumsmagneten entwickelt: Während Tausende Fans hochbezahlte
Daddler verehren, versinken Millionen Nachahmer in die Abhängigkeit. 

Schon gibt es erste Tote. Von sieben Computerspiel-toten aus dem Jahr2005 
weiß der Seouler Psychiater Kim Hyun Soo zu berichten." 

As EWFF explained in September (2004), gambling fever blossoms in a bull market when the societal urge to give in and go for broke is strongest. It continues to gain stature in the early phases of a bear market, thus providing the great Vegas explosion of the 1990s, and its continuation to this day. On April 25, Steve Wynn opened the "World's most expensive casino." The 2,700 room hotel features a $130 million man-made mountain, rising as high as seven stories, with pine trees and other landscaping that includes 100-foot high waterfalls, dancing fountains and other special effects. With it s lavish accommodations, the Wynn marries the mania-era craving for luxury with the thrill of the high-stakes gaming tables. As home of the last of the big spenders and the last of the big risk takers, the Wynn will stand as a monument to the greatest wealth peak and subsequent destruction in history. Once again, Las Vegas marks the spot where a great wave rolled back. 


 

The Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior And 
The New Science of Socionomics

by Robert R.Prechter, 1999 

 

 

The Science of History and Social Prediction Best-selling author Robert Prechter’s revolutionary two-book set, Socionomics: The Science of History and Social Prediction spells out a historical correlation between patterned shifts in social mood and their most sensitive register, the stock market.It also presents engaging essays -- representing over 20 years worth of research -- correlating social mood trends to music, sports, corporate culture, peace, war and macroeconomic trends. 

More about Socionomics


 

 

Home ] Nach oben ] SPTD-08 ] Elliott Wave Articles ] Wave Principle ] Socionomics08 ] Info ]

Copyright © 2006, ELLIOTT today. All Rights Reserved. None of these stocks are buy or sell recommendations. There is a high degree of risk in trading.
Disclaimer.All trading involves high risk; past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. No offer or solication to buy or sell securities, securities derivative or products of any kind, or any type of trading or investment advice,recommendation or strategy,is made, given or in any manner endorsed by ELLIOTT today  or any of its affiliates. Past performance, whether actual or indicated by historical tests of strategies, is no gurantee of futures trading performance or success. Active trading is generally not appropriate for someone of limited resources, limited investment or trading experience, or low-risk tolerance, or who is not willing to risk capital. There is risk of loss in futures trading .